Couldn't find what you looking for?

TRY OUR SEARCH!

Table of Contents

We know poverty can prevent us from eating nutritious foods and getting the medical care we need, but what does not having enough do to the brain?

Behavioral economist Sendhil Mullainathan and psychologist Eldar Shafir worked on the book Scarcity, which examines how a shortage of stuff we need affects our decision-making abilities, together. Their basic premise was that lacking things impacts the way in which we make decisions, whether we lack food, time, social interaction, or other basics humans don't do well without. 

The pair administered the Raven’s Progressive Matrices tests — essentially an IQ test that doesn't require either knowledge or experience — to people in New Jersey. Before they started the tests, they seperated people into rich and poor, based on the income they reported. 

They then asked participants to consider a scenario presented to them just before taking the test: "Imagine you’ve got car trouble and repairs cost $300. Your auto insurance will cover half the cost. You need to decide whether to go ahead and get the car fixed,or take a chance and hope that it lasts for a while longer. How would you make this decision? Financially, would it be easy or hard?"

The outcome? Well, there were no statistically significant differences in performance between the rich and poor groups. But then, the research team repeated the tests, asking partipants to consider the exact same circumstances again, except this time, the repairs cost $3,000. 

"Suddenly", people from the poor group performed significantly worse: a difference of the equivalent of 14 whole IQ points was noted. 

What does this mean? Well, it appears to mean that financial stress causes underperformance that a lack of financial stress doesn't, even if the financial stress is only hypothetical. This research strongly suggests that the fairly prevalent idea that poverty is the fault of poor people is wrong — being placed under significant financial stress affects someone's ability to perform well in a very real way, and who can think about how to make upward mobility (or "pulling yourself up by the bootstraps") happen when actual life stresses mess with their brain?

Why Bother When It's Hopeless?

None of these studies explain why so many poor people make "bad decisions" — or do they? Shafir, from the study above, says: "When you're struggling, poor ... a lot of the day is not so much fun. And people fail to appreciate the fact that when I buy myself a big ice cream, or a small gift" — something he says many people criticize the poor for doing — "I'm giving myself a nice minute after a complicated week, which is a good thing to do."

To see how this works, we may have to leave the academic world behind and look at the real world. Why do poor people make "bad decisions", decisions that more well-off folks believe keep them in poverty? Why don't poor people "just" make use of the free opportunities out there, avoid expensive and detrimental habits like fast food and smoking, and save money where they can?

A poor person on Kinja illustrates it pretty well: "I make a lot of poor financial decisions. None of them matter, in the long term. I will never not be poor, so what does it matter if I don't pay a thing and a half this week instead of just one thing?" 

Poor people all over the world face different challenges, challenges that affect their health and their brain. What would happen if we would collectively take these challenges and their consequences as seriously as we've taken HIV, ebola, and even obesity? 

Your thoughts on this

User avatar Guest
Captcha