My post previous here still standing, this is right if there is a clyde division, and the same goes for age groups. Prove your age or your weight, and let the race officials have that on record if someone protests. But don't post the age or weight of the specific runners - showing them in the age/weight group is enough.
Loading...
I qualify as a clydesdale, but never enter as one because I think it's stupid. Do they have a 'beanpole' division for the tall runners that have to deal with all of that extra wind resistence? What about large-chested women - now there is a true running handicap.
I've seen some Clydesdale-sized runners get peeved when they see the people who win the Clyde division because, --- surprise, they look fit and aren't much, if any, slower than the age-group winners. I think they think it should be only for overweight people. Maybe we should just go by body fat % to make sure no fit, but big people win or just give awards to anyone who is fat and runs the race.
Your fat, your run - great - your prize is better health. Your big, you run - great your prize is better health. You're small, light, but frankly just not fast enough win - great - your prize is better health.
Leave the medals to those who cross the line first.
Loading...
Loading...
Larry
Loading...
Feckin' word. I suppose I'm technically an Athena runner, being that I lift a lot and I'm pretty sturdy stock. I don't want to be gimped into a placing because I'm "heavier" (even if it is mostly muscle). I want my time on record just as it is.
Loading...