Couldn't find what you looking for?

TRY OUR SEARCH!

Table of Contents

Most people have heard of bisphenol-A, also known as BPA, and the health problems it can cause. Even plastics that are free of BPA, however, can still cause serious health problems.

For a number of years. Dr. Nancy Wayne, a reproductive endocrinologist and a professor of physiology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California at Los Angeles, couldn't find money for her BPA research. She had been among the first researchers to publicize the dangers of BPA, but with the FDA's backing of the plastics industry, there just wasn't any money for further research. Then into her laboratory came Wenhui Qiu, a visiting graduate student from Shanghai University who wanted to study BPA and embryo development. Qiu's research was funded by the Chinese government.

Qiu wanted to compare the effects of BPA and BPA-free plastics on embryonic development. If simply removing BPA from plastics is enough, then embryos that are not exposed to BPA should be free of defects found in embryos that are exposed to BPA. This kind of study can't be conducted on human embryos, of course. Qiu chose to observe the effects of the chemical on zebrafish embryos, which develop in a clear egg sac that allows for easy observation.

Most "BPA-free" plastics are actually made with a chemical called BPS (bisphenol S), which differs from BPA by the substitution of one chemical for another during manufacture. BPS is also extremely common in the environment. It appears in virtually all forms, receipts, and tickets printed automatically, and in currency.

Qiu exposed zebrafish embryos to the concentrations of either BPA or BPS that would be found in a polluted river. The effects on the fish were the same.

Zebrafish Aren't People, American Chemical Society Says

Scientific groups with ties to the plastics industry are understandably skeptical of the  results of zebrafish studies. After all, human embryos don't grow in contact with polluted water. We don't know how much BPA or BPS actually reaches the developing baby. There isn't any real evidence that either BPA or BPS is "toxic," they say, in the sense that they will kill you right away, and there isn't even evidence that they accumulate in a human body before birth.

There will never be evidence of this, for the simple reason that one cannot remove the baby to take tissue samples before birth. Between limitations of funding and limitations of ethics, much a research into the effects of these chemicals will never be done.

 There is enough evidence that avoiding both BPA and BPS is probably a good idea for the general health of children and the sexual  health of adults, especially when abnormalities of the sex organs (such as small testicles and small penises in men), infertility, and sexual performance are concerns. To do this:

  • Avoid all plastic beverage containers, especially those stored under hot conditions. Never leave a water bottle in a hot car.
  • Avoid canned food, and food sealed in foil containers.
  • Take food out of its plastic container before placing it in the microwave.
  • Buy beverages that are bottled in glass, not plastic, especially acid beverages (juice) and carbonated soft drinks.

These simple changes won't make up for a lifetime of exposure to BPA, but they will stop the chemical from accumulating. It's never too late for adults to start eating and drinking healthy, and it's never too early to protect children from environmental toxins.

  • Qiu W, Zhao Y, Yang M, Farajzadeh M, Pan C, Wayne NL. Actions of Bisphenol A and Bisphenol S on the Reproductive Neuroendocrine System During Early Development in Zebrafish. Endocrinology. 2016 Feb.157(2):636-47. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1785. Epub 2015 Dec 10. PMID: 26653335.
  • Photo courtesy of rubbermaid: www.flickr.com/photos/rubbermaid/6813883300/
  • Infographic by Steadyhealth.com
  • Infographic by Steadyhealth.com

Your thoughts on this

User avatar Guest
Captcha