Should Stents Be Used In Chronic But Stable Heart Disease?

Coronary heart disease develops when excess cholesterol and calcium build up inside the walls of the heart arteries and result in their narrowing, leading to reduced blood flow to the heart muscles. This process usually occurs over a long time, sometimes not being felt by an individual until he suffers from chest pains or a heart attack.

Coronary artery disease is initially treated by making significant lifestyle changes, including eating a heart-healthy diet, stopping smoking, and increasing physical activity. Doctors also prescribe medicines that help bring down high cholesterol, control high blood sugar, and reduce high blood pressure. Many patients are able to live in a stable condition for many years, as long as they are able to control their weight and manage other risk factors using these conservative treatments.

Indication for Use

Severe narrowing of the coronary arteries or formation of blood clots that compromises oxygen supply to the heart muscles are the common reasons why doctors use cardiac stents. These events are usually associated with heart attacks or episodes of angina. Success rate is about 95%, depending on the degree of narrowing of the artery. In some patients, the coronary artery remains narrowed, and in about one percent, an immediate cardiac bypass surgery may be needed.

Stents therefore offer an easy, safe, and effective way of treating clogged heart arteries that they have become quite popular in use. 

Stents bring good business, too, since they generate billions of dollars in sales annually for their manufacturers and thousands of dollars for the cardiac specialists who implant them.

The Controversy

The recent controversy however started when reports showed that stent placement is one of the most overused medical procedures that are often performed even when not necessary. Some scandals also cropped up when deaths were linked to the rising number of patients undergoing the procedure.

Cardiology experts began questioning whether the increasing use of stents could improve the outcome of patients with chronic but stable coronary heart disease, or if it would instead endanger many patients’ lives. Even drug-coated stents, which were believed to reduce the incidence of re-blockage several months after placement have been linked to complications and they did not guarantee long-term survival.

Read More: Abbott Absorbable Heart Stent Proven Safe and Effective

Patients with normal heart function in spite of their weak arteries are considered to have a stable condition. Optimal medical therapy consists of antiplatelet medications, which reduce the risk of blood clot formation, beta-blockers, and nitrates to reduce high blood pressure, and anti-cholesterol drugs. Results show that although the addition of percutaneous coronary intervention to optimal medical therapy reduced angina, it did not reduce death rate, heart attack risk, and hospitalization in the long term.

Patients who have coronary heart disease must discuss their treatment options with their cardiologists to learn more about their advantages and risks. It is important to first determine whether aggressive treatment will give better results than conservative therapy or if there are no significant differences in their outcomes.