A Consumer Reports study found that more than half of Americans believe the drug prescriptions their doctors write is influenced by kickbacks their doctors receive.
And 81 per cent of the nearly 1,200 people surveyed were aware that doctors are given incentives to prescribe them certain drugs.
It's common knowledge that doctors are often "wined and dined" by sales representatives of pharmaceutical companies. To promote a new medication, primary care physicians may be given free travel, accommodation, and food at luxury resorts to attend educational seminars funded and provided by the company that makes the drug.

Just how much do doctors get paid for prescribing new drugs? There are no reliable figures for the value of trips to golf resorts in Florida or beach resorts in Hawaii where "training" seminars are held, but the tiny state of Vermont made an effort to find out just how much its doctors received from big drug companies in cold, hard cash and restaurant meals. The Vermont Attorney General made an effort to determine the numbers in responding to a proposal for legislation in 2009.
- One psychiatrist received cash incentive payments totaling $112,000 in a single year, 2008.
- Ten doctors and nurse practitioners received payments of $50,000 or more.
- Twenty doctors and nurses received payments of $20,000 or more.
- One doctor received $15,000 in free food.
- The average cash incentive to a doctor in Vermont was $13,209.
Do Prescription Company Payoffs to Doctors Really Make a Difference?
But is it really a bad thing for doctors to get paid to prescribe drugs? Isn't this just a harmless source of additional income? One example of just how detrimental Big Pharma kickbacks can be is the story of the diabetes medication sitagliptin, also known as Januvia.
Even more distressing than the fact that this expensive drug did not actually work, however, was the finding that use of the drug doubles the rates of cancer in its users. What was the establishment line on this horrible disclosure? In an explanation to diabetes activist Jenny Ruhl of his comments in Annals of Internal Medicine, Dr. Mark R. Goldstein disclosed that the maker of the drug knew that it would increase deaths from cancer even before they released it:
"Extrapolating the data from the New Drug Application suggests that this has the potential to cause 30,000 extra cancers each year in the US. Since there are about 1.5 million new cases of cancer each year in this country, 30,000 more doesn't make much of a 'blip' on the radar screen."
So that's how the drug establishment regards your case of drug-induced cancer, not even a blip on their radar screen. Similar side effects exist for drugs promoted to treat depression and diabetes. Don't let these unnecessary drug-induced horrors happen to you. Even if your doctor is a skilled and caring physician whom you trust, chances are you should ask many questions about any drug you see heavily promoted on TV. And don't be afraid to ask you doctors whether a drug company pays them to write your prescriptions.
- Press Release, Office of the Attorney General, State of Vermont. Drug Marketing Disclosures Show Nearly $3 Million In Payments To Vermont Prescribers. 15 April 2009
- Ruhl, Jenny. Januvia 3rd Most Heavily Marketed Drug - VT Drug Disclosure Document. http://diabetesupdate.blogspot.com/2008/07/januvia-3rd-most-heavily-marketed-drug.html.Accessed 29 December 2010
- Photo courtesy of Tj Blackwell on Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/tjblackwell/4679548147