Girls with small breasts should be treated differently when it comes to being topless

There is no reason why you can't go topless, just because others may comment and pass remarks it's totally up to you if your body confidant with your small breasts then be proud and show them off, you may think not many people are interested in females with small breasts but there are more that are than you think, nipples that are barely visible are a lot more fun then semi hard nipples all the time as it's easier to know when your turning them on by seeing them start to erect.

Every male/female has different things that attract attention off others doesn't matter if it's good or bad, speaking as a guy I love small breasts specially with puffy aroela's not because they are a turn on but because they are a turn on because they are beautiful to me.

Wow, this is so interesting. Both my sis and I have small boobs and light coloured areolas which actually fade into the skin at their rim, but my sis has inverted nipples whereas I have large nipples which get easily hard. When adolescent my mum would always allow my sis to be topless in the morning, for breakfast etc., whereas she would ask me to put on Something. And even now, my sis is for example always showering topless in public places like the gym even when there are men and nobody ever takes offence. So maybe there is a practical difference already. For my part I wouldn't want to show my boobs anyway but I found it unfair when adolescent and being treated differently from my sis.

Very interesting, if somewhat discriminating, point of view which I share actually. Of course a lot of women would claim the right to go topless for every woman but I never really could get myself to believe in the "our breasts are just like men's breasts" ideology. They are very different but some are less different and some are even closer to a child's and true enough where there's less to show there's less need to hide. My chest is close to flat with very small areolaes and nipples, light coloured and usually soft (and the difference between hard and soft is very small too), and once I had made peace with my body (that is to say when I was 22, 23), I had this feeling that I didn't really need to cover up, no more than a child would have to anyway. I tried this in various places. In public swimming pools I was never successful, but in the mixed shower I got away with it most of the times. Changing in public has only led once to an argument. The most fun was at a bar on a beach where they refused to sell me wine because they thought I was underage. Once they were convinced that I was not they asked me to put something on. I asked the girl who had told me to if she didn't find it weird that I should be obliged to dress simply because of my age and not because of my body. At first she didn't get it but when I asked her what she wanted me to cover up exactly, what she thought there was on the upper half of my body to be covered up, she said that I was right but that it was the rules. In the company of friends there is of course no problem at all, even though some were very surprised when they saw me topless for the first time and I also had to explain my point of view.

I love your point of view but if you were allowed to go topless I wouldn't be able to get any work done. My erection would keep getting in the way. I'd have to spend all my time massaging it for sweet relief. I'll probably go to bed tonight dreaming about your tiny babies.

lol, that's of course the other side of the question. One of my absolutely very best friends, with whom I've never had a romantic relationship though, is also aroused by my non-existing titties and admits freely to it. He's in general turned on by women with small breasts and I'm of course on top of his list. So I'm aware of the "problem". But as I said: I don't believe in the "women's breasts = men's breasts", because that's simply not true, women's breasts will always be more sexual than men's and that's from my point of view a good thing. I didn't say that I would never arouse anyone by going topless. But again, as someone wrote above: we don't hide everything which may get someone turned on. But I am not speaking about the subjective way in which one may react to my naked bust, but about the objective fact of what there is to be seen. Even there I have to admit I couldn't answer the question as to where a line would have to be drawn, when would it become offensive to show breasts, which cup-size, which colour of areola, which type of nipple? I suppose there are the obvious situations where it could be considered offensive (I would include already A cups, actually any breasts which have the form of breasts, even if very small, but also alternatively dark couloured or larger areolas and large or long nipples, I think it's all about the visibility of it), but there's clearly a grey zone and then there are the other obvious situations, where no one should be offended. You see, my breasts started to develop when I was 10 and stopped a year later and never changed from then on. They only make for a slight swelling on my chest, my areolas are 1,3 cm, my nipples 2 mm large, practically a part of the areola when soft, 2 mm long when hard, with a small slit which closes, all soft pink. At 11, I was still very free and was topless at home and in the garden in summer regardless of who was there as we were all used to as children. On my 12. birthday an aunt of mine made a remark, a nice one, but still a remark, "shouldn't a grown up girlie like you wear something proper from now on" or something like that and by the end of that summer my mother also asked me if I didn't feel that I should stop being topless when with my friends. We had a small swimming pool in our garden and I was always topless but it's true that that year none of the other girls was anymore. And the next year she ordered me to put something on. And I hadn't changed. And I didn't understand. And two boys even asked me if I was growing something eventually and when I said no they asked why I covered up, and there was also a new girl who hadn't started to develop at all and she stayed topless but my mother wouldn't hear about it for me. So that's where my initial question comes from. Afterwards I became very body-conscious and I wouldn't have undressed for the world, but that's a different part of the story and a different reason to get dressed. Of course, the reason why my mother asked me to cover up is the same as in the bar on the beach and your remark also of course: someone might get turned on by me. But again, the example of the feet is a good one I think. My boyfriend loves feet with the 2. toe longer than the others, it's kind of a fetish I'd say. Well he's free to see mine very often and to admire other women's very often too. When he saw a woman wearing the type of shoes with a small hole in front where normally only the big toe sticks out and she wore it in a way that instead the 2. and 3. toe were visible and they reached out beyond the sole of the shoe, he showed it to me and told me that that's to him as if she were wearing a t-shirt with two holes where her hard nipples would stick out. But we don't condemn that type of shoe nor do we criticise women with that type of feet who wear it even though the fetish is well known and I've met men who loved my feet for it very often. I truly believe that in the same way my type of bust is not sexualised by itself, as a standard breast is, even if it may interest fetishists of flat chests as these feet do, and that should allow me to be topless.

You said: "I don't believe in the "women's breasts = men's breasts", because that's simply not true, women's breasts will always be more sexual than men's and that's from my point of view a good thing."

I wonder if that's true for all humans. I have watched videos of African and Amazonian tribes where they wear no clothing and breasts seem to just be something that's present for feeding babies. Do they get any sexual pleasure from them? In one video the tribal girl gets the white girl who is doing the research to remove her top and holds her breast looking at it because it's white. The white girl seems quite reluctant to having her breasts exposed and inspected or possibly because the cameraman can see them.

Also after a hunt the whole family gets involved in what appears to be picking ticks or insects from the men and can be seen picking them from his foreskin and scrotum like it's just a normal thing to do, young girls included.

So is it just us who derive sexual pleasure from certain things because we are taught that way growing up?

I grew up with two girl playmates, no boys and we played in the lawn sprinkler naked. We thought nothing of it and certainly noticed our differences. They loved to watch me pee because I had a tool dedicated to that purpose and that fascinated them. I was never embarrassed about them watching me nor were they when they squatted to pee. We (I) tried to see where their pee came out. They helped by trying to open their legs as much as they could so me and the other girl could see in there better. We never did figure out where in came out. Then we inspected nipples reasoning theirs must have holes for the milk to come out but even though theirs looked a little different than mine we never found the holes.

At some point in time adults forced us to stop and then girls parts were very specifically hidden from the boy (me). However if I was in the bath when they came over to play it was still OK for me to walk past them naked getting to my room to dress while any of their parts were always kept hidden from me.

I wonder if that makes us boys always yearn for naked girls and do some of the things we do to achieve that?

My wife and I used to joke about her aaa bandaid sized bras and was happy I liked her teeny tinys. Now in our 70s they are much larger to my dismay and hers.

I was surprised a few years ago when Free The Nipple came visiting that most states and towns have no laws against being topless. It's left up to towns to regulate that. In Vermont it's OK and one town is famed for the high school girls and guys hitting the park naked as soon as it's warm enough. The only rule is you can't get undressed in public. So they strip in a car or building then go out. Topless is legal in NYC.

A friend who hiked the Appalachian Trail 20 years ago met the famed naked hiker in ME. She talked to him for about 20 minutes while her hiking buddy stood nervously by waiting to get outta there. She wrote in her journal she was disappointed because he was a "middle aged fat guy with a little wrinkly one".

So you girls worry about tiny boobs and I get to worry about my little wrinkly one, guess that makes us even. But I've never heard any girl say she likes little wrinkly ones and you have a whole fan club.

Interesting thoughts. Of course you can take this further. If it needs a flat chest it may also need small nipples and areaolas. Or you could say that normal size breasts are ok to go topless if you don't have big nipples or if you don't have dark nipples etc. I don't know. It somehow sounds right and at the same time it feels completely wrong for else our boobs get to be accepted by society no matter how they look or you feel that any breast is sexual whatever it looks like. As a teenager I only started to get dressed all the time when my breasts were growing. The first budding I was still ok with but when the nipple got out that's when I started to wear a shirt all the time. My parents didn't even have to make me do it it was just me feeling it was right. So maybe if I had not developed breasts I would indeed have gone on like before but I believe that at a certain age I would have been dressed all the time anyway. Today I'd like us all to accept topless in public whatever the breast. But I suppose breast or areola or nipple size can still make a difference. A colleague tells me she doesn't feel free to go topless on a beach because of her areolas. Her boobs are flat but her areolas are very large and dark and you notice them immediately and this makes her feel bad. Otherwise she'd do it. So we also treat ourselves differently according to all these criteria.

Hiding breasts anyway is only a cultural thing, so it's not about what there is to be seen or what there isn't, it's about the symbol, which is sexualised. As a matter of fact it's also sexualised for tribes where women go topless but they accept the sexual nature more freely than we do. So flat, small, normal or large can't make a difference in our society. I'd like things to be different though, not in order to be constantly topless or to go outside in the streets topless, most men also don't do that, but in order to be able to change my shirt or to try on bras or to work in the garden or maybe in the streets of a seaside resort during holidays or in the woods to hike etc. where I wouldn't think it a big deal to expose my breasts, without having to make such a fuss about it. I have to add that when I'm topless in public, I attract often more attention because of my small breasts than I would with normal-sized ones because everyone tries to check my age I believe. So it's not that simple...

Keira Knightly is an exhibitionist. Talking about her breasts in this way certainly has turned her on. There's nothing wrong with that as long as one is honest with oneself. At the age of 15 I also liked to show my chest using my underdeveloped titties as an argument that there was nothing to hide anyway. Eventually my areolas got bigger and I had to dress more often, but I still do like a good show-off.

I'm afraid we are being treated differently but not in the way you suggest! People stare at me more than they would if I had normally developed breasts and in some instances they actually check my age. This has been the case last week during our holidays when they suspected me to be an adolescent and so my friend of an illegal relationship. While it was obvious to everyone that he was older (he's exactly my age 23 but unfortunately he's balding already very visibly which makes him look older than he is) I passed for a young girl with no tits and only small areolas and nipples and also (it's only now that I write this here that I notice that hair plays a part for both of us) with only thinly haired pubes. They excused themselves later but it was an awkward moment, we had to fetch our IDs and were being treated like criminals. They must have passed the word around though for for the rest of the week we were left alone.

Body acceptance is no easy thing in our societies, nor for our own bodies, nor for the bodies of others. If you don't fit the norm, you may want to hide, if you don't hide, you may get stares or remarks. I have more or less flat breasts, not completely but without an actual breast shape, they're more of a light bulge on my chest, with small areolas, but which are dark and I do have nipples though. But still. I don't feel I should be obliged to hide my chest. I don't feel ashamed, but I don't think of that part of my body as something intimate either and I sure would like the others to accept that and let me be. I undress very freely but I make people uneasy when doing it. There was this period, let's say between 10 and 16 when other girls started to cover in public and I could still get away with it as long as I passed for a child, but then that was over because it was visible that I was not anymore a child. So yours are interesting thoughts. Yes, we should be able to get different treatment even if I don't know where to put the line. My nipples would probably disqualify me anyway. But anyway, I get your point completely.

When I started university I looked for a side job. A friend of mine was doing nude model in an art school and offered me to come along. I've never had a problem being topless in public given my flat chest and I thought what the heck there's nothing to be seen in the bottom half either so let's do it. To make it short I've been rejected by one teacher for lack of curves. But another one wanted me badly in order to break his students' habits.
This experience set aside my story is pretty much anybody else's here. I had to cover up and even wear a bra at a certain age not convinced that it was really necessary. That was over 20 years ago (I'm 34 now) and I believe today, what with equal women's rights it would be easier to make my point even as a teenaged girl. Needless to say I was back at braless as soon as I left my parents and as I said also bared my chest very freely but I often had to explain that I was no exhibitionist quite the contrary. The size or the existence of boobs isn't important so it seems when it's not sex related. But for the last years it seems to me that I get away with it more often in all kind of situations but maybe it would be the same if I had boobs.

I have grown boobs but I may give my experience as an adolescent. I was a late bloomer as far as breasts were concerned and my parents let me freely be topless as late as age 14. Then my breasts started budding and a couple of months later when it was obvious I was developing they asked me to put clothes on. I found it unfair at the moment but I realise that I've been treated according to my body and not to my age which now seems to me to be only half bad...