super sensitive glans after adult circumcision

Glad you found the pleasure of direct contact with the glans. Since I discovered that I never roll the foreskin up and down, I hold it back as tight as I can so I can stroke the bare glans and the inner foreskin. That's the main reason I want to keep my foreskin is the inner part. Since you had such a tight one you probably never had that pleasure anyway so you don't miss it. I like to do it dry. I've tried lube and that seems to take away most of the wonderful direct contact feelings.

I'm only against circumcision when it's done to babies and young boys who have no choice in the matter. I think it's fine as long as the owner of the penis wants it done and preferably gets some information about the different types. I would not like to lose my inner foreskin. I would want it to be just like I hold it for masturbation -- fully pulled back with the inner foreskin covering my shaft. That would be what they call high and I would also want it tight as what's the sense of being circ'd if you are going to have some floppy skin left. To me the best part of the way I masturbate is being able to caress all the bare skin without it moving.

The reason you used to come faster may be due to your inner foreskin. Even though you weren't able to touch it directly you were still stimulating it. Some have claimed it has more fun nerve endings than the glans but I only notice that rubbing it feels different than rubbing the glans and both are pleasure filled.

I think Dr. Kellogg was wrong about cutting boys and girls to stop them from masturbating. I think it makes you even hornier.

Hi Perez2016:

I am glad it worked for you and you are happy with it. Many guys are disappointed and would like to have their foreskin back.

Circlist is a website maintained by men with a circumcision fetish. It cannot be trusted.

I came across that site about 10 years ago and they are just plain weird over there. At first they seemed to be providing some good information but it soon became just a freak show.

Hi, I got circumcised exactly 1 month ago; the incision has healed completely but my glans is still sensitive.  Obviously, it is not nearly as sensitive as it was a month ago but I still can't touch it freely or play with it.  The other areas of the penis feel fine with the exception of the glans.  For those men that have been circumcised, when will this sensitivity stop completely?   (I can sleep facedown now as well, but having my glans touch anything that's too hard (such as the mattress) will generate some minimal pain.  Is this normal 1 month after the incision?  When will my glans become free from this minimal bruisal pain?  

I don't know why you chose to be circumcised. The permanently exposed and unprotected glans is one of many problems caused by circumcision.

Some circumcised guys choose to restore their foreskin by non-surgical restoration. It takes a while but you can recover and protect your glans after some years of restoration.


Foreskin restoration was known in ancient times and is mentioned in the Bible. The process was carried out in Biblical times by Jews who wanted to look like Greeks. It is mentioned in the Bible. The process was lost but rediscovered about 1970 by men who objected to having been circumcised without their consent. Many still do not know that foreskins can be restored.

The decision to restore one's foreskin is a personal decision. It depends on how strong one’s feelings are about one’s unwanted non-voluntary circumcision, because foreskin restoration by tissue expansion is somewhat slow. Some men think it is worthwhile to restore and others don't think so. The process is slow and not for everyone. One must feel strongly about the desire to have a foreskin

Surgical foreskin restoration has been tried but does not give good results. Moreover, some men have had very serious complications from surgical foreskin restoration. The favored method is non-surgical foreskin restoration.

Non-surgical foreskin restoration can only proceed as fast as skin can grow. The human foreskin is a double layer of skin so two inches of skin must be grown to have one inch of visible foreskin. Many circumcised men do not fully understand how much tissue was amputated and how severely they were injured by circumcision

Some believe that foreskin restoration goes much faster when one is young because there is more growth hormone in the body. The stretching causes tissue expansion and permanent growth of the length of your foreskin.

One does well to start young when there is more growth hormone in the body, because the skin probably grows faster and you will have more years to enjoy your new foreskin.

Nonsurgical foreskin restoration works by "tissue expansion". When traction is applied to skin to keep it under tension, the skin reacts by expanding to relieve the tension. New skin cells are formed and the skin under tension expands. This is a permanent increase. Cells divide to create two skin cells out of one. The process is called "mitosis". The time taken for cells to divide limits the speed of foreskin restoration.

For foreskin restoration the shaft skin is placed under longitudinal tension or traction, which causes it to expand so as to make it longer. Traction is applied to the residual skin to put it under tension. The skin reacts to relieve the tension by mitosis and tissue expansion. In tissue expansion, mitosis (cell-splitting) increases the size of the skin and permanent increase in length occurs.

As the shaft skin gets longer, one starts to see little wrinkles in the skin. As elongation continues, skin will start to pile up in the coronal sulcus. Then, with increasing length, the shaft skin will start to lap over the head in a little fold. This is the start of the new foreskin. Since a double layer is needed, quite a lot of skin must be created.

Continued stretching and skin expansion will eventually cover the head of the penis with foreskin. Over the longer term, it is possible to create a foreskin that is long enough to cover the erect penis.

Foreskin restoration improves appearance. As the foreskin lengthens, the scar from the circumcision is covered over and disappears. The result is a very natural appearing foreskin that is very difficult to distinguish from a natural foreskin.

The procedure does not use drugs or surgery and the medical profession is not involved in any way. Non-surgical foreskin restoration is very safe and painless.

The restored foreskin keeps the glans penis moist and sensitive. The layer of keratin on the glans of the circumcised penis sloughs off after a period of constant coverage by the restored foreskin. The surface becomes softer to the touch.

Foreskin restoration cannot restore the frenulum, nor can it restore the heavily innervated ridged band, however, a restored foreskin does have sensation. Morever, the increased skin mobility allows better stimulation of the remaining nerves.

Non-surgical foreskin restoration has beneficial sexual and emotional effects.

Foreskinned males who have short, inadequate foreskins may use the same techniques to lengthen their existing foreskin.

There are now several good devices on the market to make foreskin restoration go faster.

Search the Internet for "foreskin restoration" for more information.

Was curcumsized 9 days ago.. The first week was tough (very tough!) My penis was super sensitive.. Almost to a point that i regretted getting it done! But now.. I'm over the moon! I just can't believe how quickly things change.. I can now touch the head of my penis (yes it's still sensitive but it feels awesome) Honestly can't wait until it's fully healed so I can exeprience masturbation as a curcumsized man! For those in their first week of getting circumsized.. I would suggest very tight briefs so the penis does not move around a lot... And showering so it experiences temperature change! Them 2 points did the trick for me!

Oh and Roland.. Give it a rest! It doesn't matter what you think.. As long as the persons happy with the outcome.. That's all that matters! :) I'm personally delighted to have done! :)

I'm happy you made the decision to get circumcised.
I got circumcised about 6 weeks ago, the pain is now nearly nonexistent (the first week was excruciatingly painful).
Don't listen to those on this website who have dogmatic views on circumcision and who insistently argue that circumcision is a hoax or a mutilation. They are probably working for some foreskin restoration medical company and only hope they can lure circumcised men in submitting themselves to such exorbitant medical procedure which only benefits the lucrative realm of medical treatment in the United States.

...

Circumcision is the way to go:
No beautiful woman wants to have his handsome man drop his boxers to the ground and shamefully reveal an hideous, elephant-like, sagging penis with excess foreskin and a foul odor of uric residue.
The foreskin carries NO EVOLUTIONARY advantage in terms of reproduction.
In addition, it CARRIES NO HEIGHTENED SENSE OF SENSITIVITY (unlike most myths claim).
I was circumcised 6 weeks ago and have noticed as a newly circumcised man that sex is just simply sex.
Sex without foreskin DOES NOT lead to a more pleasurable experience.
It's not as if American and African men (the vast majority of people circumcised today around the globe) engage in sex less frequently than uncircumcised men. Don't listen to all these charlatans on the web claiming circumcision is evil - how do they know circumcised men experience less sensitivity when they've never been circumcised themselves? It is an internal contradiction in and of itself.

Some people claim ghosts exist, yet how do they know this when they haven't even seen one in real life? This is exactly what I mean with circumcision; all these charlatans on the web claiming circumcision is this wicked procedure that robs a man from his sensitivity or his 'malehood'. Sex is sex my friend. Whether or not you are circumcised, the nerve cells are numerous in the penis and the glans; and men will exhibit extreme pleasure nonetheless. The natural friction generated during sexual intercourse compensates for the negligible friction the extra foreskin generates during sex.

Ever since I was circumcised I've noticed that my ejaculations are a lot more voluminous. Moreover, there has been NO DISTINCTION in terms of pleasure or sensitivity (than when I was circumcised).

Unlike those charlatans on the web, I have been BOTH circumcised and uncircumcised; and I can attest to the best of my sincere knowledge that the distinction in terms of sensitivity between circumcised and uncircumcised is absolutely negligible. New nerve cells grow in erogenous areas of the penis as the incision heals. The penis is the penis, it has nerve cells all over it and not loss of extra foreskin will rob you from the wonders of sex.

These dogmatic anti-circumcision folks on the web try to deceive you with a simple fallacy: "Oh, you lost a great deal of nerve cells during foreskin removal; you should exhibit a great loss of sensitivity; you will regret getting the procedure done eternally."

But the reality is that these folks are committing a simple fallacy in logic (known as fallacy of composition): just because a part of a whole is affected DOES NOT necessarily suggest that the removal of that part will affect the natural function and structure of THE WHOLE. The foreskin is just an accessory, it carries no evolutionary advantage and its removal does not mean that it will cause a drastic TOTAL loss in terms of sensitivity. These people claiming that the removal of the foreskin leads to this great loss of sensitivity is an easy way of deceiving prospective patients in not getting the procedure done. Just because something is true of its parts does not mean you can apply it a whole because the whole is a completely different animal to start of with. The penis is the penis, no loss of extra foreskin will make you enjoy sex less in the future. A penis is a penis. Sex is Sex. Go and interview the vast majority of circumcised American men and they will tell you how much they enjoy sex. Them not having an extra piece of skin does not make them less masculine or less fertile than any other men.

Don't feel as if you lost a great appendage of the body. IT'S JUST FORESKIN FOR GOD'S SAKE. This meaningless piece of extra skin is VESTIGIAL. It is a RELIC. It carries no evolutionary function. American men bear children just as well as European men; not having an extra piece of skin attached to your penis does not make you less of a man.

The greatest benefits for me at least has been effortless hygiene maintenance - no longer do my boxers smell like urine due to the residue leaks from urination (now that the foreskin is gone). A simple shake after urination and I'm ready to go. My penis smells just like it's supposed to smell and that is 100% clean and without any foul odors. It also looks much more aesthetically harmonious (minimalist) rather than having my penis resemble the tip of an old elephant trunk.

Throughout history, it has become beyond evident to us that species, plants, and humans change drastically over the passage of time. Just look at how much animals and human beings themselves have changed in the last few centuries. People and species evolve based on their needs. Dinosaurs don't exist; yet we must reach a point in which we accept this fact and learn to move forward in time with a new vision and mentality.

That is why getting your foreskin removed is nothing to be ashamed of; it is a mere way of claiming how modern man is ultimately and fundamentally changing and moving forward into the future with a more open and minimalist sensibility. Look at our phones and our current laptops, they are becoming increasingly more minimalist and this certainly contributes to their material elegance and effortless function. You are no longer holding a brick-sized cell phone because technology and science has made it possible to make parts smaller and make phones more minimalist. Technological gadgets are becoming increasingly smaller and that is something that is making our lives better and more transparent.

Similarly, don't let anyone tell you circumcision is wicked because it is clearly not.

Congratulations on getting the procedure done and feel free to post any other thoughts or ideas on this forum!

I thank those that have provided feedback on my posts and for those that have shared their stories and experiences about circumcision.

Your glans will remain feeling sensitive (and awesome) only for the first month. After the first month, the sensitivity in the glans will disappear entirely (and become closer to normal skin). My first ejaculation as a circumcised man was excruciatingly pleasurable (in part because the glans was still sensitive from the circumcision and that feeling of pain contributed to the pleasure). However, by now the sensitivity is almost zero; yet I notice that my masturbation sessions are usually longer and more subtle (in terms of pleasure) than when I was a circumcised man. This may be in part because masturbating as as a circumcised man is absolutely different than masturbating as an uncircumcised man. Now MUST use vaseline or some other lubricant to come to an erection (obviously), but the level of pleasure is for some reason most felt beneath the glans (in the trunk of the penis).

So you agree that Dr. Kellogg was wrong when espoused that circumcising boys would keep them from polishing their rockets.

Dr. Kellogg? polishing their rockets? I don't understand...

Thank you all that have posted their perceived benefits after circumcision on this forum.   I myself have been very pleased with the surgery and will highly recommend it to any other men suffering from phimosis or from any of the symptoms of being uncircumcised.  I agree with the other new member that one of the members in this forum has definitely come across as very heavy-handed on those men that are circumcised.  If anything, this forum has been made to share one's mutual experiences and benefits of being circumcised; and not to harshly denigrate one's decision to get circumcised.  One need to respect one's decision and not try to dispirit or demoralize those that have made such decision.  If anything, this forum has been made to encourage one another in the decision to get circumcised.  I have received a lot of benefit reading from one's experiences of getting circumcised and have learned how to deal with the initial pain resulting from the surgical procedure.  I suffered from extreme phimosis but was finally able to accrue the financial assets to get the procedure done at the age of 24.  Circumcision in many cases is the ONE and ONLY solution to phimosis and one that is often times the best solution.  (elasticity creams are useful only to those suffering from mild phimosis).  I must confess this decision has changed my life and look forward in seeing how it will continue to improve my urinary and sexual health.  (btw, it just feels so clean being circumcised; letting the water from the shower run down your glans and letting water do the cleaning).  Circumcision also reduces the risk of urinary tract infections as there is no possible way bacteria could propagate inside the foreskin now that the skin has been removed. I highly recommend it to anyone considering it or with mild or extreme phimosis.  

Most individuals are able to make their foreskins retractable without surgery.

Almost all boys are born with a foreskin that does not retract. This is normal. It takes years for the ability to retract to develop. About ½ of boys have a retractable foreskin by 10.4 years of age. Many adolescents still have foreskins that have tips that are too narrow to pass back over the penis head. These foreskins may be gently stretched over a period of time to cause them to widen.

Foreskin retraction is not absolutely necessary. A male may masturbate, receive oral sex, have sexual intercourse, and father children with a non-retractile foreskin. Some believe that sex is better with a non-retractile foreskin.


It is frequently said that sex with a non-retractile foreskin is painful. That is not true. The only time pain occurs is when a male with a tight but semi-retractile foreskin tries to have sex and the foreskin retracts during intercourse. The tightness of the foreskin is painful. Sex with an absolutely non-retractile foreskin is not painful.

It is normal for teens to have a foreskin that does not retract. One’s foreskin is still developing. If you want your foreskin to retract (not everyone wants a retractable foreskin), then you can help it develop ability to retract by stretching it.

If you choose to stretch your foreskin, then the goal is to have a foreskin that glides smoothly back and forth so as to provide maximum pleasure.

When your penis is erect, gently pull your foreskin back against the head of the penis. As the head attempts to pass through the foreskin it will stretch the skin a little. Do this several times every day and in a few weeks or months your foreskin will widen and you will be able to retract your foreskin. Do NOT force retraction. Do NOT cause yourself pain.

It works by tissue expansion. Stretching skin induces “mitosis” which is a word that means “division of cells”. New skin cells are formed and the skin expands but it takes some time. The increase in size is permanent. Be patient and give mitosis time to work.

The important thing is to put the skin under tension every day so that it will grow wider.

Search the Internet for:

“How to Fix Phimosis and Tight Foreskins, Solutions That Work”

and you will find the information and support you need.

Phimosis is a disease. If you can't see your glans that is not normal. I suffered from phimosis as well as balanitis (abnormal inflammation of the glans) and anytime I tried having sex it was extremely painful. The elasticity creams only work for those having mild phimosis. The only solution for me was a full circumcision. I don't understand why people are so against circumcision. It is their choice. I like vanilla ice cream, you like chocolate. It is just a matter of taste. What evolutionary advantages does a foreskin carry? to catch traces of urine and cause a foul odor? To protect the glans? How would it protect it if circumcised men eventually recover from the pain of the surgery ultimately have their glans restored to normal, pervading, erogenous skin? We have to recognize that the glans only exhibits sensitivity for a very finite amount of time. I will keep insisting that circumcision DOES NOT reduce sensitivity. Yes, nerve cells are removed during the procedure; but that doesn't necessarily mean that your penis will become numb of pleasure because of this. Perhaps the removal itself actually activates new erogenous zones in the penis never before felt while uncircumcised. You just don't know. The human body is not as simple as a less developed evolutionary animal and its vast and rich complexity doesn't permit us to form hasty generalizations or superficial inferences based on such little information. I confided in my urologist when he assured me that no sensitivity was going to be lost once I got circumcised. He was right. I repeat: phimosis is a disease. If you can't glide your glans up and down as most normal men due than that is not normal or healthy. You need to be able to see the glans and wash it. A tight foreskin has long been deemed the primary culprit of urinary tract infections. When you have an ejaculation, how do you expect to wash of all of that semen properly if your foreskin is tight? It is not healthy having semen smeared down beneath the foreskin for days. This will inextricably create a favorable environment for bacteria to thrive. Phimosis in many cases can only be solved best by circumcision. I'm not trying to promote circumcision on the web or in this forum since I know that it is only a lucrative supplement to American urologists and general physicians but in many cases it is the only solution if you suffer from extreme phimosis. This forum is dedicated to those that see the perceived benefits of circumcision. It is a lack of respect at least in my mind when you have dogmatic, extremist commentators come to this forum and make recently circumcised men feel as if they had their penises butchered and mutilated, bringing in biblical sources in when this matter is entirely scientific. Foreskin Restoration is exorbitant; especially for those who know of the lucrative realm of medical industry which thrives in the United States. Doctors nowdays are only seeking money. Capitalism has driven the existence of this field only for the greed for more money. No extra flap of skin is going to make you feel anymore like a God in bed. Men should become cognizant of this basic fact and learn to be satisfied, content, and confident with what they have. Circumcision is not an evil procedure, it is only a minor, cosmetic, efficient way of dealing with a better hygiene. That is all.