I have gained so much knowledge from this extensive thread that it's only fair for me to add my own Holep experience.
I'm 74 and had been followed by a urologist for a number of years and started Flomax about 5 years ago. I had a HUGE prostate, MRI measured at 168 grams, but I generally managed life despite most of the symptoms of BPH. What altered my treatment plan radically was an emergency trip to the ER over the holidays for full retention -- a very painful experience. Catheter put in but a few days later I had another retention emergency when blood clots in the bladder covered the drain holes. Luckily I was seen by Dr. Andrew Wright, who did a cystoscopy to check for bladder cancer. As he was doing this, he was also recommending that I consider a Holep procedure. He does this procedure, but feels 140 grams is his current limit, and referred me to his mentor, Dr Joel Funk at Banner Medical Center South here in Tucson. Apparently Dr Funk is one of only a handful of Holep surgeons who do surgeries on prostates my size (they can even be bigger!!). As I understand it, the only other surgeon in Arizona to tackle prostates of this size is at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale.
I saw Dr. Funk in February and his earliest available surgery date was May 31st, which I took. In the interim, at his recommendation, I had 5 sessions at the Pelvic Floor Laboratory, learning with biofeedback how to control and strengthen my sphincters. I made progress.
So the big day was only 10 days ago. It was outpatient and I went home with a catheter. The next morning I went back and the nurse removed it after inserting fluid into the bladder. Then I had to demo I could urinate. Success!! Rather than over detail my recovery, let me say I experienced many of the aftereffects written here, so I certainly felt normal. First few days had plenty of blood clots, and blood in the urine was common for a week. I had control, but certainly had a small spasm or two. I used men's guards until two days ago, and they were great. I used a kind with reusable elastic bands to hold them in place, and didn't wear anything else under my clothes.
I decided to stop using the guards "cold turkey," as I felt I could take care of the post-urination dribbling with a short use of toilet paper. It seems to work fine. I suppose I could still have an accident, and I suppose blood in the urine could return, but so far things are going great. I drink a lot of water.
I see Dr. Funk on Thursday, and until then, I'm not doing anything even close to strenuous (and I'm normally quite active) and I haven't resumed my sex life. I'm expecting a green light for both on Thursday.
I forgot to mention Dr. Funk took out 148 grams of the 168. It was sent out for pathology.
Thanks to all who have contributed to this great thread.
Bruce
I would like to share my experience with Urolift and Holep. My prostate was 75 ml and medications were not helping. I researched Urolift and went to Georgetown University in DC, the only place in the area which does the procedure. Dr. Bandi suggested that although I am a candidate for Urolift, I should strongly consider a Holep. He recommends Urolift only in patient with small and medium size glands (upto 50-60cc). I decided to try Urolift. I was a 5 minute office procedure. It worked better than medications but I wasn't satisfied. Had a holep later and wow, what a remarkable improvement. Should have listened to my doctor!!
Hello: I am new to this site and looking to learn more about HoLEP. Question: I live in Florida. Does anyone know if there are any EXPERIENCED HoLEP surgeons in the S.E. USA? Thanks
Robotic Nerve Sparing Total Prostatectomy vs HoLEP?
Has anyone considered having a robotic nerve sparing total prostatectomy instead of HoLEP? Both procedures generally require an overnight stay in the hospital; both result in minimal bleeding; both seem to have similar post op side effects; BUT with the total prostatectomy you would shoot two birds with one stone --- you would solve the BPH problem AND eliminate the cancer risk. What is not to like about that?
I have heard many reports from men who have had the robotic nerve sparing total prostatectomy (for cancer) that their post op experience seems to be much easier and with fewer adverse effects than those who report post-HoLEP.
Is there something that I am missing? I wonder why people don't choose the robotic nerve sparing total prostatectomy instead of HoLEP?
Thanks so much for your input.
You can contact Dr. Dora in Tampa.
***this post is edited by moderator *** *** web addresses not allowed*** Please read our Terms of Use
Attention Dr Lingeman patients:
Does anyone regret the fact that Dr Lingeman does not do a separate pre-HOLEP evaluation and work up??? It seems that many of the other HOLEP doctors require an additional pre-op visit and that often includes a cystoscopy. This is a significant consideration when choosing which doctor to go to.
I will appreciate your input. Thank you
Attention previous HOLEP patients:
Many of the HOLEP surgeons require an additional pre-op evaluation and workup which includes a cystoscopy. Now that you have gone through the entire experience --- do you still feel that the extra preop visit is necessary??? In other words was anything determined that made a significant difference?
The reason I ask is that I live a long distance from most of the surgeons and I wonder if the two visits are really necessary. Dr Lingeman (the "father" of HOLEP in the USA) does not require such a visit.
Thanks so much for your input.