Fortnights should be decades. I think I was napping, old guys do that.
Nothing wrong with being body positive.Most females always are hiding breasts behind padded bras so afraid that their nipples will be seen.Both females and males have nipples so what.Being top less in the house let it happen if she wants to go nude let her.So many females have body shame.
I think it must be an adult thing because all I had was two girls for playmates from the age of zero. We used to play in the lawn sprinkler and I remember a few times we held serious inspections trying to figure out where the milk came out of theirs and how they differed from mine. I mean, there MUST be holes there somewhere. As soon as the girls began to develop any possible signs of breast growth it was like our mothers built a wall and I was excluded.
one summer i was 15 years old at the time it was hot that summer i go in my bedroom close the door go naked i thought one way to be cool go naked i was a 15 year old teenage boy back in 1974 streaking was the greatest event i was 10 years old at the time i wanted to go streaking 5 years later i go streaking i had a good time streaking running through the cool morning air naked
My daughter actually never came to wearing a bra. She's only grown an A cup (and a small one with that), so it was kind of difficult to explain her that she should wear a bra in order to support her breasts. I would have liked her to in order to hide her areolas and nipples, but she never felt the need, so that was it. It's only recently that I think she tries to show them off by wearing tight or transparent tops. Plus she has a photo of Bruce Willis daughter pinned in her room, you know the one going topless in LA, and I wouldn't be surprised if she tried to imitate her. I would like her not to, but I don't know how to bring her to abandon her habits.
Why push the bra free the nipple.So what if she has transparent tops never make her feel body shame.Even when she wants to go top less allow that freedom.We are so clothes minded.
Females are exhibionistic by nature. It is in their DNA starting with Eve tempting Adam. Adam likely thought tjat apple bite would get him laid. lol
she should have the same rights as men .as a father would encourage her to show off her body .it gives them self-esteem
That's the thing. My daughter was desperate for a bra when she started developing and when a year later not much had come out of it she ditched it. Later on her areolas and nipples grew but she never gained much breast tissue and she wouldn't hear about wearing bras out of modesty. Everytime I remind her to she talks about free the nipple and threatens me to go topless. What can you do. I leave her alone but I'm not happy with it.
I say let her be. If she wants to show off HER body....who are you to stop her??? My parents tried stopping me as a young teen but I rebelled. I was known for being in the boys locker room performing oral lol. I too started with going topless and letting boys put their hands under my shirt to feel my little growing boobies. It felt amazing. I felt so empowered and proud of my body.
IN MOST STATES NOW IT IS LEGAL FOR FEMALES TO GO TOPLESS ON THE BEACHES BUT YOU NEVER SEE THEM DO IT AND I WONDER WHY
In cultures where females are often seen topless in public, there is no corresponding male mating response. So, I think Western culture has simply eroticized the female breast. What else could account for the facts?
Hmm. Maybe there is another explanation. When men are shown photos of brown women topless, there is no corresponding male mating response, But when shown photos of topless white women, there 'is' a corresponding mating response, across all cultural lines. So, it doesn't turn men on to have their babies nursed on brown female breasts, but it is a turn-on to all males to have their babies nursed on white female breasts.
I think the latter is probably the truth. So, I have no problem with brown females going topless in public, but topless white females would cause a male reproductive response, which could greatly increase the incidence of sexual assault. It would probably stand up in court as a defense that the female disrobed! It's a valid legal defense if she disrobes in private! Males lose control of rational thought processes when presented with a nude white female! So, since almost no sexual assaults are ever solved, it's better that white females cover up.
I mean, it's a scumbag thing to force a female. But there are a lot of scumbags in the world. I've had females I could have easily taken advantage of, but any normal male wants the female to be in a clear state of mind, not drooling on the pillow. Otherwise, she's just being used. I mean, I want the female to give herself to me because she loves me, not because she can't defend herself.
But, alas, in a world of progressives and secular humanists the female is viewed by males as a summation of the pleasure she can supply. That creates an environment in which females are used as barren recepticles to sate the male's primal urge, and nothing more. It's very unfortunate that females have allowed themselves to be reduced from personhood to objects.
Christian males believe God created the female as an equal to the man, as an intimate gift from his creator. Sensual beauty is an unspoken language understood only by masculinity, which communicates the Divine Promise to create new life in the image of married lovers and in the image of God; new life the female can call, 'her own'.
Progressive liberals rob the female of her greatest gift: the ability to bring new life into the world. Rather, she is made a beast of burden, to slave 8 hours in the workforce, slave at home the remainder of the day, without gratitude from anyone, because she has cast off her mate in the name of equality.
If being treated like dirt makes her equal, what was she before that? Every culture but Western culture treats females like dirt. A sign in South Korea reads, 'Virgin brides for sale! If she runs away in the first year, we'll replace her for free!" And that's not nearly the worst of it. As America drifts away from the Christian ideal, females are relegated to the dirt heap, to be used and abused for the pleasure they can supply, walked all over, and spit on, all without a speck of love to carry her through until daybreak.
How many beautiful females will go to sleep on a tear-soaked pillow tonight, because they have no one to love, and no one to love them? They'll go out and do the same thing they've always done: throw themselves at males in hopes of a few moments of male attention, to discover again that males want one thing: no-strings-attached sex.
So, it's a shame that some white females have so debased themselves that they actually 'want' to go topless in public! This could only be because of the ancient maxim: There are obvious limits to human intellect, but none whatsoever on stupidity.
Hmm. Maybe there is another explanation. When men are shown photos of brown women topless, there is no corresponding male mating response, But when shown photos of topless white women, there 'is' a corresponding mating response, across all cultural lines. So, it doesn't turn men on to have their babies nursed on brown female breasts, but it is a turn-on to all males to have their babies nursed on white female breasts.
I think the latter is probably the truth. So, I have no problem with brown females going topless in public, but topless white females would cause a male reproductive response, which could greatly increase the incidence of sexual assault. It would probably stand up in court as a defense that the female disrobed! It's a valid legal defense if she disrobes in private! Males lose control of rational thought processes when presented with a nude white female! So, since almost no sexual assaults are ever solved, it's better that white females cover up.
I mean, it's a scumbag thing to force a female. But there are a lot of scumbags in the world. I've had females I could have easily taken advantage of, but any normal male wants the female to be in a clear state of mind, not drooling on the pillow. Otherwise, she's just being used. I mean, I want the female to give herself to me because she loves me, not because she can't defend herself.
But, alas, in a world of progressives and secular humanists the female is viewed by males as a summation of the pleasure she can supply. That creates an environment in which females are used as barren recepticles to sate the male's primal urge, and nothing more. It's very unfortunate that females have allowed themselves to be reduced from personhood to objects.
Christian males believe God created the female as an equal to the man, as an intimate gift from his creator. Sensual beauty is an unspoken language understood only by masculinity, which communicates the Divine Promise to create new life in the image of married lovers and in the image of God; new life the female can call, 'her own'.
Progressive liberals rob the female of her greatest gift: the ability to bring new life into the world. Rather, she is made a beast of burden, to slave 8 hours in the workforce, slave at home the remainder of the day, without gratitude from anyone, because she has cast off her mate in the name of equality.
If being treated like dirt makes her equal, what was she before that? Every culture but Western culture treats females like dirt. A sign in South Korea reads, 'Virgin brides for sale! If she runs away in the first year, we'll replace her for free!" And that's not nearly the worst of it. As America drifts away from the Christian ideal, females are relegated to the dirt heap, to be used and abused for the pleasure they can supply, walked all over, and spit on, all without a speck of love to carry her through until daybreak.
How many beautiful females will go to sleep on a tear-soaked pillow tonight, because they have no one to love, and no one to love them? They'll go out and do the same thing they've always done: throw themselves at males in hopes of a few moments of male attention, to discover again that males want one thing: no-strings-attached sex.
So, it's a shame that some white females have so debased themselves that they actually 'want' to go topless in public! This could only be because of the ancient maxim: There are obvious limits to human intellect, but none whatsoever on stupidity.
Is this really such a big thing over there? I'm living in Germany, I'm 20, and in my classes in secondary school only half of the girls wore a bra. It was not related to bust size but a personal decision. Some did it out of modesty, some because they felt the need for it or because they thought they had to. Some only wore a bra from time to time, one girl I knew only started to wear one when she thought her breasts had fully developed, but more stopped wearing one at 16/17 when they felt comfortable with their body. But most of those who didn't wear one simply never had one and were certainly not made to wear one by their parents. I had one at the beginning, when I was 10 but I never liked it and when a couple of years later I saw other girls who grew breasts and stayed free I got rid of mine too. My mum only took notice of it: "You're not wearing your bra anymore?", I said no, I was ready to explain, but she simply said "Ah, ok", and that was that.
Watch big titsafter all, a girl who wants to show me her big breasts for free
I have an easy question: Who the hell is in charge in your house?