Browse
Health Pages
Categories
PDD-NOS no longer exists as a diagnosis. Should it ever have? And what will people who would previously have been diagnosed with PDD-NOS fall under now?

What is Pervasive Developmental Disorder-Not Otherwise Specified, and is it a real disorder? No matter why you want answers to this now quite unusual question, we're happy to help out. The answer is both quite complicated and rather simple. 

Here's the short version — the symptoms of PDD-NOS are real and will continue to fit many people, but children and adults displaying those symptoms are now likely to be diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder instead. This new diagnostic category replaced several different DSM-IV labels including that of PPD-NOS, bringing all autistic disorders under a single umbrella.

PDD-NOS: No longer a DSM diagnosis

Pervasive Developmental Disorder-Not Otherwise Specified — sometimes referred to as "atypical autism" — was a diagnostic category in the now-defunct DSM-IV, the diagnostic manual used in the US until 2013. Though the World Health Organization's ginormous list of diseases, the ICD-10, still includes PDD-NOS, the DSM-5 that superseded the previous version of the US diagnostic and statistical manual no longer includes this diagnosis. 

People who would previously have been diagnosed with PDD-NOS who meet the current diagnostic criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder will simply be considered autistic now. In most cases, they'd additionally be considered to have what the DSM-5 calls "level 1 autism", meaning they will require some support to function optimally. Colloquially, this would be referred to as high-functioning autism or mild autism. Some people who would have been diagnosed with PDD-NOS in the past will, meanwhile, not meet the diagnostic criteria for autism, and will thus not be diagnosed with anything. 

Was PDD-NOS ever a real disorder?

That's very much open to debate. 

Under the DSM-IV, vague labels with the add-on "not otherwise specified" were sometimes used to diagnose people who didn't neatly fit into any of the more well-researched, well-understood, categories. These may have been people who clearly struggled, but who defied clear diagnostic labels. A formal diagnosis is often necessary to access support and services, and for some, the label of PDD-NOS helped.

Pervasive Developmental Disorder-Not Otherwise Specified might have been diagnosed if a person met some of the diagnostic criteria for other autism-related disorders recognized in the DSM-IV — Autistic Disorder, Asperger Syndrome, Rett Syndrome, or Childhood Disintegrative Disorder — but not enough to warrant a diagnosis. 

Was PDD-NOS a real disorder, or a diagnosis that essentially just meant "Sorry, we don't quite know where you fit?" The fact that a single paragraph was devoted to it in the DSM-IV is quite telling. That paragraph basically just said that PDD-NOS could be diagnosed when a person:

  • Had struggles with social communication and interaction. 
  • Had deficits in the areas of verbal communication and non-verbal communication — things like body language and eye contact.
  • Had so-called stereotyped interests and behavior — like autistic stimming (hand-flapping, spinning, etc) and special interests.
  • But couldn't be diagnosed with another autism-related condition because their symptoms emerged later in life, weren't severe enough, or were quite a bit different than what clinicians would usually expect to see.

PDD-NOS vs Autism Spectrum Disorder: How do the new diagnostic criteria differ?

You've now seen the bare-bones diagnostic criteria for PDD-NOS. Autism spectrum disorder, which brings all autistic people together under a single diagnosis, is much more thorough. It identifies the two main domains in which autism manifests — differences in social communication and interaction, and repetitive, narrow, areas of interest and behaviors. 

For the first, the DSM-5 lists the following examples:

  • Differences in or struggles with back-and-forth social interactions, like not being very interested in sharing emotions, not knowing how to strike up a conversation, or finding it hard to engage back-and-forth dialogue with people. 
  • Unusual non-verbal communication, demonstrated, for instance, through a lack of eye contact, a blank facial expression, or an inability to understand the gestures people often use. 
  • Trouble developing or maintaining social relationships. 

The second key characteristic of autism may be displayed through:

  • Self-stimulatory behavior, such as hand-flapping, lining up objects, repeating certain phrases, fidgeting, and so on. 
  • A need for routine and familiar situations, and trouble dealing with new situations or changes. 
  • Rather intense and particular interests — often called special interests or autistic obsessions — that take up a lot of time and energy, often to the exclusion of pretty much everything else. 
  • Unusual sensory reactions, which can include being really sensitive to bright lights, sounds, pain, textures, smells, and so on, but also being much less sensitive than is typical. 

These traits have to show up early in life for a person to be diagnosed with ASD, though it is certainly possible for that diagnosis not to come along until adulthood. They also have to cause significant struggles and shouldn't be better explained by another diagnosis. 

Autism Spectrum Disorder is a broad term that encompasses people with and without intellectual impairments and people with language delays — including non-verbal people — as well as those without. Once a diagnosis is made, the DSM-5 also sets forth three different levels of severity.

At level 1, an autistic person will struggle to live their best life without support, but may have developed coping mechanisms to the point that they can pass as non-autistic among people who don't know them well. Folks who would previously have been told they had PDD-NOS are most likely to fall into this category, since this old diagnosis covered people who didn't quite meet the diagnostic criteria for other forms of autism. 

Sources & Links

  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA
  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text Revision). Washington, DC
  • Photo courtesy of SteadyHealth

Post a comment