Vaginal sex doesnt excite me.....only anal.

There seems to be a theme running through some of the modern literature about women (and others) feeling pressure to engage in anal sex. While this may (or may not) be true, pain and sacrifice to gain social/romantic acceptance may be over-rated by the psychologists ... once a person gets over the initial discomfort or whatever that eases them into sex, anal or vaginal or whatever, the trust seems to be that there are far more nerve endings in the anus and bordering parts of the female anatomy, and these lead not only to pleasure and delight beyond normal vaginal sex but also birth control and "bonding" that 5th base seems to offer in "going all the way" and "every" way to please a partner and one's self!

Indeed, read up on Kara Crabb on why girls should ONLY have anal sex ... great birth control ... spend your money on anything buttt panties

KARA CRABB has great advice - from the Internet on pantiless:

i've been going commando for the last 15 years and can't imagine going back! other than the health issues that can come from it, no one likes to see unsightly panty lines or thongs hanging out of the top of your pants. i think that's worse!

Indeed, apparently Ann Boleyn got started by a French preference for "putting your seed where you should not" and passed herself off somewhat effectively as somewhat virgin. In any case, anal sex is economical (free) and effective (as in contraceptive/birth control) .... and certainly a preference for many couples!!!

Indeed, anal sex has a lot more appeal to some persons than others. Particularly for folks who have had problems and surgery to the vagina that makes sex there impossible or quite difficult, anal sex is "bread and butter" with a double t!

It seems that among many advantages of anal or "only anal" sex (such as birth control & a more intense form of sharing on "5th base" than ever before, to name just a few .. including that "she" can "do" he with a dildo night & day to equalize the pleasure/penetration/fulfillment equality), is the fact that the vagina has a cervix to "bump/bang" into, usually forcing the penis to the side, but in the anus one can generally penetrate, diving to heaven like never before in a woman (or man for that matter) as deep as deep will go. Not a bad form of gratification when one thinks of it, either going into the woman and/or the man's pleasure/pressure tunnel of love.

INDEED - I HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO FIND AN "HONEST" COMPARISON OF THE NUMBER OF NERVE ENDINGS IN THE VAGINA VERSUS THOSE IN THE ANUS (AND COMPARISONS TO THE CLITORIS & OTHER "ERECTILE" PARTS OF THE FEMALE PELVIC. AREA ... ARE THERE ANY "HONEST" NUMBERS GOING AROUND OUT THERE TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION/MATTER?

Don't listen to the nay sayers. Porn didn't warp you. I have been the same way since I was interested in women as a preteen. I love going down on them...but the back door has always been what actually makes me shudder with craving anticipation everytime.

It's all about delivery and compromise. If you can give a woman your all emotionally, build up a strong trust foundation, please them in other ways...(become a master at foreplay) than there are a good number of women this would really be no issue to. With the proper deliver it may even be craved by them.

Don't be pushy. Always compromise. Always do things at a pace that is best for them. Most importantly NEVER be ashamed of who you are. Confidence is key with partners, and how is she going to trust you to do something that the more sexually repressed society is misunderstood over if you are nervous about what you crave?

There is someone out there for everyone, and changing yourself is lying to a great woman out there who would love to stray away from the repressed expectations of boring normies and create a sense of utmost trust with you. Just make sure to always pay it back to the best of your abilities everytime whether it's through favors that are sexual/non sexual.

So called "panties" were imposed by fashion/invented in about 1935 when elastic made them more possible/comfortable ... a menstrual aid that could (as in "should," according to the advertising) be suitable for "every day wear." Before then, a "chemise" or shirt/gown was quite satisfactory as the only undergarment a well dressed women could ever want or need (except in very cold weather or circumstnces)!

A good example of paying more and more for less and less material ... and usefulness ... buttt what a boon to gynecologists & doctors treating yeast & other infections, generally prevented by fresh air, sunshine & sunshine under one's skirts!