Browse
Health Pages
Categories
Do you love criticizing people's grammar mistakes on social media? Not only does this say more about you than about them, as a study confirmed, you also have much to gain by putting a stop to this annoying habit.

Are you a self-proclaimed "Grammar Nazi"? I can tell you one thing for sure. You'll never say you could care less about common uses (or abuses) of grammer while sipping on your expresso, irregardless of whether you could definately hurt someone's feelings by pointing they're nasty errors out. For all intensive purposes, your always their to fix the supposably great writing of you're Facebook friends, or at least to rant and rave about it elsewhere on the web.

OK, OK — I'll stop now, I promise!

Are you wondering what on Earth happened to the English language in the age of web publishing, worried that it won't be long before once reputable newspapers begin featuring the same kind of errors — or stewing in the knowledge that you've indeed already spotted them there?

I'll share a few secrets. Having been a sub-editor before the internet became such an integral part of people's lives, my mind begins editing any writing it encounters automatically. And also, I just started a sentence with a conjunction. And again! (Oops, that was an actual fragment.) And also, I occasionally encounter completely embarrassing typos in my own older articles, proving that the mind so often sees what it thinks it wrote rather than what it actually did write, especially when you read your own sucky writing shortly after producing it.

Here's a thought: nobody's writing (even Mark Twain's — who freely employed the "literally" people seem to get so hung up about today as an intensifier) is free of the kind of errors you routinely judge.

Should you really be fixing people's linguistic mistakes, to their faces or behind their backs, then? What does this tendency say about you, and how does the way in which people use language impact the way we see them? Perhaps most controversially of all, are the things you deem mistakes really mistakes?

Who Are The Notorious 'Grammar Nazis'?

Just who are the people who judge others negatively on their use of language? A research team that later published its findings in the journal PLOS One was eager to find out, and recruited 83 native English speakers from the US, who were invited to figure out what they thought of potential house mates based on adverts they wrote. Some of the ads contained "typos" and "grammos" galore, while others were free of spelling and grammar errors. After the exercise was complete, the participants were more closely investigated themselves.

Personality tests revealed that Grammar Nazis come from all walks of life — they are young and old, blue collar and white collar, and female and male. Likewise, a person's level of neuroticism, perhaps surprisingly, can't predict whether or not they are likely to be bothered by deviations from standard English.

The study, aptly titled "If You're House Is Still Available Send Me an Email", did figure out some things, however.

Grammar and spelling freaks are more likely to be introverts.

Those who take issue with spelling mistakes tend to be more conscientious and less open, while those who judged potential room mates negatively on grammar mistakes are more likely to be disagreeable people.

Study author Robin Queen said: "My guess is that introverts have more sensitivity to variability." In other words, those who require solitude to "recharge their batteries" might simply be less tolerant of others who are different to them. While Queen is a linguist and not a personality expert, she seems to be onto something here.

Why It's Time To Quit Being A Grammar Snob

Modern English is a jumbled mess of bits and pieces from all kinds of different languages — not just the French and Latin you're perhaps familiar with, but also all the others it bumped into over time. Not only are the countries native English speakers are deemed to come from (deemed, yes, because English is an official language in more countries than you think) notorious melting pots for various historical and economic reasons, the English language — as a modern global language — now belongs to the whole world.

Many of the "errors" you see are not errors at all, but rather dialects, ethnolects, and sociolects. The English language is the language of Hillbillies, African American people, Cockneys, people from post-colonial India, Eastern European internet users, and others alike. No matter how well informed you are or what you studied, you can't possibly be personally familiar with all its varieties.

Language is living, too. It changes over time, to the point that many dictionaries including Merriam-Webster now list "irregardless" as a word. Talking about words, what is a word? Google's very own dictionary offers an interesting definition:

"A single distinct meaningful element of speech or writing, used with others (or sometimes alone) to form a sentence and typically shown with a space on either side when written or printed."

Hence, there's a powerful argument in favor of the idea that if you're able to understand it and use it for communication, it's indeed a word. It might be a non-standard word and one you'd rather avoid using, but it's still a word.

If you're an unrelenting Grammar Nazi, you may just want to consider moving away from prescriptive grammar — the idea that there's such a thing as a single correct way of using language bound by a single correct set of rules — and try something else on for size.

Descriptive grammar is the idea that if language is used to effectively communicate, it's correct, whether it's standard or non-standard.

Is it weird to expect standard use of language — standard British spelling and language in The Guardian, and standard American spelling and language in The New York Times — in print, then? Hardly, and you'd certainly not like to see the kinds of things I started this article with in either of those publications! Text messages, though? Spoken-word poetry? A chat with your neighbor? There's no such thing as the English language. Rather, it might be more accurate to speak of countless variations, not a single one of which is "most legitimate".

The way in which someone you know uses language to communicate verbally and in writing can actually tell you many interesting things about them: what regions they spent time in, whether they're dyslexic, what ethnic group they might belong to, what their sub-culture is, when they were born, and more.

How You Benefit From Ditching Grammar Snobbism

Detox from self-proclaimed grammar snobbism, and you may find that you suddenly lack things to feel smug about. You do have stuff to gain in the way of personal and social growth, though!

  • Instead of correcting others' use of language, you might be able to spend more time on improving your own writing and speaking, by making it more effective rather than necessarily more "correct". Consider this, for instance — no matter what you think of Donald Trump, there's no question that the fact that his use of language "bigly" differs from other politicians' has made him more relatable to some people. Relatable is good.
  • Speakers of AAVE, African American Vernacular English, are usually bidialectical, the same of which holds true for speakers of other dialects. While grammar snobs are hung up on one "correct" form of English, bidialectical folks are easily able to code switch. By learning from others' linguistical patterns rather than judging them, you could even become better at learning new languages.
  • Most of the things so-called grammar snobs address aren't even grammar related, but rather pertain to spelling, syntax, and pronunciation. If you think you're a "grammar" snob, you might just look a little silly.
  • Nobody likes people who correct their spelling, syntax, or grammar on social media. You have nothing to lose but your judgmentalness (not a word, I know), and a lot of friends to win!
  • Using texting and web speak like "LOL" and "2nite" can save you some time.
  • Understanding why people use language the way they do helps you connect with them, rather than creating a division.

Sources & Links

Post a comment