Browse
Health Pages
Categories
That sounds like a load of bull. i used to want to go topless as a child because i had always been allowed to do so . And since i started growing breasts i was afraid of having that freedom taken from me. so many times i wished my chest would go flat again so i could stay topless like the boys. can you explain that?
Nowadays, at the age of 21, i want toplessness for women to be normalized on beaches and anywhere and anytime where a man being topless is normal. i still have the dream of being able to go to the shop topless on a hot summer day and not have anyone bat an eye.
Tell me am i still a 'sexually deviant teen'?
i used to go topless in front of my family while my breasts were budding and it did make me uncomfortable when my brothers and sisters kept looking at my breasts which is why i stopped letting them hang out.
its pretty insane that going bare chested in front of their family would arouse them, it did the exact opposite for me. i simply wanted it to be normal.
Reply
I don't believe a word of that story and if it is true then the parents need professional help and you also have two boys who started starring at her, what is wrong with you people I like womens breast but not my sisters or my daughters. Sick sick sick.
Reply

why are boobs even a sexual thing. its basically just fat cells. y'all need to get over ur sstuff lol 

Reply
nice, we also let our kids watch us having sex. Maybe someday we can watch them
Reply
Your amazing parents!
Reply
That makes total sense u let them be
Reply
Do u hang out naked together?
Reply
It is natural and I enjoy the young girls showing breasts along with their tender ever-changing bodys that humans admire and need for survival. Love at work
Reply
You sound like a well adjusted person with reasonable expectations. Personally, I see no reason to cover anything based on gender. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. These are all just body parts and everyone has them. There's only so many types, even though there are different shapes and sizes. They are just boobs... and half the population has them, give or take a few. The only reason kids are up tight is because parents are up tight. Left to their own devices, kids would probably grow up naked (weather permitting) and we'd all be in a better situation after a generation or two.
Reply
This writer and I are working with different definitions of a 2 word combination. Anyone I would consider to be a "young girl" would be years away from having their bodies changing. I would call them "girls" from about 8, and wouldn't expect to see their bodies change for a couple more years. It's more debatable what to call them once the bodies begin to change. Sticking with "girls" is fine with me, but "pre-teens" would work too. Both suggest to me a awareness of their femininity, but "pre-teen" is narrower, expiring on her 13th birthday, while the looser definition of "girl" could apply until she is a middle aged woman, and some times beyond. "Woman", "young woman" and "teen" usually apply to females with everything is there and working. Of these, "teen" is the narrowest applying to only 7 years of her life but can apply to a late bloomer who has yet to have everything working on her 13th birthday. Young woman, by my definition, could apply to a girl a-couple-of-years-plus before her 13th birthday, and could continue to apply as long as "girl" could apply. It's probably not a good idea to use the word "woman" without the word "young" before it before she reaches her 20s, if not 30s, or 40s.
The second thought that comes to mind when reading this statement has to do with the writer. Is it a woman who sees girls bodies in the locker-room or enjoys watching her daughters grow up' or a father who enjoys watching his daughters grow up. Or is this a boy of this age who has become very good at sweet-talking girls of his age into letting him see their bodies. If this is a man writing about seeing naked girls in-the-flesh, that is very creepy.
You could say that the writer appreciates the "beauty of the female form" regardless of age, and there's nothing wrong with that. But if you're viewing absolutely beautiful photos shot of a nude 11 year old girl, last week, you are at great risk of viewing child phonography, a very serious crime. You could view vintage nudist photos, but they aren't very clear or very big. If you are an adult, it is probably best it is probably best to limit your method of satisfying your wish to view the beauty of the female form, by viewing women who have their 18th birthday in the rear view mirror. But what about viewing "their tender ever-changing bodies"? TOUGH LUCK! By their 18th birthday, they are long pass that but they're legal. Whether you like it or not, that's an excellent trade-off.
Reply
You hit on something that registered with me too. This subject really get the Europeans going. Here, in not only the United States, but in California, with it's reputation for being liberal on many subjects, 90% of the replies leave me saying, "Why do I not see any evidence of this attitude when I am in public or even semi-private areas?"
Reply
She needs cunnilingus
Reply